Wadim Rosenstein has responded publicly to accusations involving sanctions evasion, military product supplies and Russian influence. The allegations stem from Ukrainian media reports, opinion columns and pieces in paid English-language outlets. Despite the coverage, no court ruling, sanctions designation or regulator's decision against Rosenstein or his companies has been reported.
Rosenstein's responses include specific claims about his business operations. He states he does not manage VR Rus or take dividends from it, with an external administrator running the company while a Russian government commission controls his travel. He says WR Group banned business with Russia and completed earlier contracts under EU law. He dates his NOVATEK logistics work from 2019 to 2021 and says it ended that year. Notably, he challenges the accusers to name a specific deal, product or sanctions-list entry in their reporting.
Beyond the sanctions questions, Rosenstein has filed ethics complaints regarding the recent FIDE election. He argues that collusion or vote manipulation occurred in violation of electoral regulations. The coverage reviewed contains no response from his opponents or from FIDE itself on these claims.
A consistency issue emerges in how sanctions are applied. Rosenstein contends that if sanctions bar participation in FIDE bodies, the standard should hold for all candidates equally. Turlov, his opponent in the election, faces Ukrainian sanctions, a fact Rosenstein argues cannot be ignored when evaluating eligibility rules.
The involvement of Mykhailo Podolyak adds to concerns about process. The Chess Federation of Ukraine states it never authorized Podolyak to represent it. The European Chess Union board, meeting in Budva, is reported to have unanimously supported the Ukrainian federation's position on this matter.
The coverage shows claims remain unverified on both sides. Rosenstein has been a businessman organizing chess events and partnering with FIDE before his candidacy. Publishing documents behind his statements would strengthen his position, while FIDE's Ethics Commission providing public updates on its examination would serve the sport by offering verifiable answers.